![]() ![]() ![]() The debate was triggered by intra-elite tensions, and subsequently by the need to respond to public disaffection over the deficiencies in the implementation of social justice in Iran. This formula has elicited additional debate, especially since 2011, over the reciprocal status and dependence of the two concepts. It maintains that true justice can be realized only within an Islamic system ruled by the ‘fully qualified jurist’. ![]() The hegemonic Shiʿi discourse in Iran defines justice as based on three principles: awarding every person their due rights according to the law ‘setting everything in its place’, and the elimination of tyranny and oppression. Unlike vilayat-i faqih, the meaning and essence of justice in post-revolutionary Shiʿi-Iranian thought has not received due attention in the scholarly debate. Justice and the guardianship of the jurist ( vilayat-i faqih ) have been the two ideological pillars of the Islamic Republic of Iran ever since the 1979 Revolution. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |